What Factors Are Associated With Guideline Use and Compliance?

Resource type
Author/contributor
Title
What Factors Are Associated With Guideline Use and Compliance?
Abstract
Clinical guidelines are recommendations targeted at medical professionals which aim to optimise patient care. When successfully implemented, clinical guidelines have been shown to improve processes of care and clinical outcomes. However, clinical guidelines are often not successfully implemented and there exists a significant variation in rates of compliance between different doctors. Factors which affect compliance fall in to four categories: patient, doctor, environment and guideline. In 2015 the Canterbury District Health Board changed to a new platform of online clinical guidance called Hospital HealthPathways. This platform differed significantly from its predecessor The Blue Book in both the development process and design of the clinical guidance. This study compared the use of and compliance with guideline recommendations between these two different platforms of clinical guidance. By doing so, this study was able to examine how guideline use and compliance is affected by the development process and design of a clinical guideline. Sub-group analysis examined how compliance varied between different clinicians, different patients, and different environments and also the interaction between these factors and guideline design. A sub-analysis examined barriers to guideline compliance reported by clinicians to understand the perceived obstacles clinicians had to following guideline recommendations. Finally, this study developed the concept of “appropriate non-compliance” by quantifying and describing cases where it was appropriate for clinicians not to follow local clinical guideline recommendations whilst managing patients.
Type
Masters
University
University of Otago
Date
2018
# of Pages
206
Language
en
Notes

Study topic
Evaluation of clinician compliance with clinical guidelines, comparing Canterbury DHB’s legacy “Blue Book” with the newer Hospital HealthPathways platform.

Study type
Mixed-methods study including retrospective audits, Google Analytics, clinician surveys, and statistical modeling across three conditions: CAP, acute pancreatitis, and ICH on warfarin.

Key findings

  • Hospital HealthPathways significantly improved guideline use and compliance compared to the Blue Book, and reduced variation in practice between clinicians.
  • Patient factors (e.g. co-morbidities, illness severity) were major contributors to non-compliance, regardless of platform.
  • Appropriate non-compliance—where deviation from guidelines was clinically justified—was common and quantifiable, challenging the assumption that 100% compliance is ideal.
  • Clinicians reported barriers including time constraints, lack of mobile access, and perceived irrelevance of guidelines to complex cases.
  • The study highlights the importance of guideline design, usability, and development processes in driving adoption and consistency.
Citation
Callender, R. (2018). What Factors Are Associated With Guideline Use and Compliance? [Masters, University of Otago]. https://ourarchive.otago.ac.nz/handle/10523/8219