Implementing online evidence-based care pathways: A mixed-methods study across primary and secondary care

Resource type
Authors/contributors
Title
Implementing online evidence-based care pathways: A mixed-methods study across primary and secondary care
Abstract
Aim To understand what contextual influences, mechanisms and outcomes affect the implementation and use of localised, online care pathways (HealthPathways) in primary and secondary care. Design and procedure Mixed-measures design. Quantitative data included number of page views and conditions viewed. Qualitative data from semistructured interviews and focus groups were gathered over a 6-month period, and analysed using NVivo software. Setting The first HealthPathways UK site, South Tyneside, England. Participants General practitioners, nurses, practice managers, hospital consultants and system leaders (managers, commissioners) (n=76). Results Use of the pathways significantly increased over time. Themes were developed showing how online care pathways were used—leadership, pre-existing networks and relationships; development of systems and processes for care pathways, the use of online care pathways to support decision-making and referral, and perceived availability of resources. Inter-related themes were arranged into configurations consisting of contextual influences, mechanisms and outcomes. Recommendations were made for future implementations, such as improved data collection processes to understand how and why there was variance in the use of pathways. Conclusions This study was early in the implementation process; however, emerging themes will facilitate the future implementation and use of online care pathways. Recommendations are made for further research to include other health and social care users and patients to inform future developments.
Publication
BMJ Open
Date
12/2018
Volume
8
Issue
12
Pages
e022991
Journal Abbr
BMJ Open
Accessed
7/7/25, 2:17 AM
ISSN
2044-6055, 2044-6055
Short Title
Implementing online evidence-based care pathways
Language
en
Library Catalog
DOI.org (Crossref)
Notes

Study topic
Evaluation of the early implementation of HealthPathways in South Tyneside, England—the first UK site—exploring what influenced uptake and use across primary and secondary care.

Study type
Mixed-methods: Google Analytics, interviews, and focus groups with 76 participants (GPs, nurses, consultants, system leaders).

Key findings

  • HealthPathways use increased steadily over 10 months, with users valuing it as a centralised, easy-to-navigate resource for decision-making and referrals.
  • Localised pathways were more trusted and frequently used than non-localised (NZ-based) ones.
  • Clinicians appreciated the responsiveness to feedback and the opportunity to shape content, which encouraged engagement.
  • Barriers included lack of integration with clinical systems, time constraints, and inconsistent localisation.
  • While some clinicians were unsure of long-term impact, most saw HealthPathways as a promising tool for improving care coordination and reducing variation.
Citation
Akehurst, J., Sattar, Z., Gordon, I., & Ling, J. (2018). Implementing online evidence-based care pathways: A mixed-methods study across primary and secondary care. BMJ Open, 8(12), e022991. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022991