In authors or contributors

HealthPathways implementation on type 2 diabetes: A programmatic evaluation (HIT2 evaluation)

Resource type
Authors/contributors
Title
HealthPathways implementation on type 2 diabetes: A programmatic evaluation (HIT2 evaluation)
Publication
Journal of Integrated Care
Volume
27
Date
12 2018
Language
en
Notes

Study topic
Evaluation of the development, implementation, and acceptance of HealthPathways for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) in a large metropolitan Local Health District in New South Wales, Australia.

Study type
Mixed-methods programmatic evaluation including surveys, interviews, site visits, and web analytics.

Key findings

  • 63% of surveyed GPs used HealthPathways, with 47% using it specifically for diabetes care.
  • 87% of GPs reported HealthPathways helped provide more care in the community, and 69% said it enabled them to manage patients they would have previously referred.
  • 81% of GPs found HealthPathways improved the quality of care and supported diagnostic processes.
  • 75% of GPs found HealthPathways easy to use, and 94% agreed the information was high quality and practical.
  • 37% of GPs reported improved relationships with hospital clinicians, and 44% reported improved relationships with patients.
  • Google Analytics showed 160,695 page views, with 7% related to diabetes pathways; gestational diabetes and newly diagnosed T2DM were the most viewed.
  • HealthPathways was perceived to facilitate transparency, engagement, sustainability, and accountability across healthcare sectors.
  • Barriers to use included forgetting to use the site (52%), limited time during consultations (33%), and preference for other resources (24%).
Citation
Chow, J., Gonzalez-Arce, V., Tam, C., Neville, B., & McDougall, A. (2018). HealthPathways implementation on type 2 diabetes: A programmatic evaluation (HIT2 evaluation). Journal of Integrated Care, 27. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICA-07-2018-0047